1107.5438

I am happy to be back in blogosphere after a gap of around one and a half months. There were too many things I was involved in related to the administrative branch of my home institute. Slow and inefficient Indian bureaucracy takes too much time to get things done, can't help it. Anyway, I am feeling quite blank regarding what to post. The easiest thing to post is about my latest paper which appeared in arxiv last week. The title of this post is the arxiv pre-print number of my article.

The paper titled as " Spontaneous Parity Breaking and Supersymmetry Breaking in Metastable Vacua with Consistent Cosmology" is all about study of some cosmological issues in a model where Left-Right symmetry can be broken spontaneously as well as Supersymmetry can be broken in a metastable vacua without any reference to hidden sectors (like in usual Supersymmetry breaking models) . Such a model was constructed recently by a Japanese group, we study it in details and point out some cosmological issues which needs to be addressed. The issue is related to the formation of domain walls (extended two dimensional topological objects) which are formed after the phase transition accompanying the discrete left right symmetry breaking. These domain walls have very high energy density compared to usual matter or radiation and if they start dominating the Universe, the standard cosmology will be in trouble in view of recent experimental data from WMAP (Wilkinson Mass Anisotropy Probe). We discussed some techniques to get rid of such unwanted walls in earlier works also and the basic idea is to incorporate gravitational effects which break the discrete symmetry explicitly leading to a pressure difference across the walls. Thus the true vacuum will expand and occupy the entire observable Universe. The model we are studying in this present paper is however different from earlier models in the sense that here both left right symmetry breaking and supersymmetry breaking mechanisms are specifically mentioned, that too without talking about hidden sectors. Such theories are based on Seiberg duality which relates a UV free supersymmetric gauge theory to an IR free magnetic theory thereby making computations easier in both the regimes. The magnetic theory , if assumed to describe the low energy world, also breaks Supersymmetry spontaneously. Supersymmetry preserving vacua also appear dynamically in the magnetic theory leading to metastable vacua. The work I have done, studied the constraints coming from such long lifetime of metastable vacua as well as domain wall disappearance in the left right symmetric model. The life time constraint gives a lower bound on the left right symmetry breaking scale whereas the domain wall disappearance puts an upper bound on that scale. Fortunately these bounds don't conflict each other and more excitingly the lower bound coming from long life time of metastable vacua requirement lies pretty close to the TeV scale. Anyway much more work needs to be done in these models and our work just tells a tiny part of it concerning mainly the domain wall disappearance!

1105.5006

The title of this post refers to the pre-print of my paper which appeared in arxiv.org today. It's about domain wall formation in spontaneous R-parity breaking models and one possible way to get rid of them by introducing gravity induced higher dimensional operators. Before I go one step further may be I should say something about various technical terms appearing in the last sentence. Domain walls are two dimensional objects which are formed whenever a discrete symmetry gets spontaneously broken. They have a finite topological charge and hence are stable. In our work, this discrete symmetry is the left-right symmetry under which the left handed chiral fields are exchanged with right handed chiral fields and vice versa. Left(right) handed means direction of spin is opposite(same) to (as) the direction of momentum. This discrete symmetry arises in one very promising extension of standard model of particle physics where tiny neutrino masses naturally arise by seesaw mechanism. These domain walls are extended objects and hence will start dominating the Universe after the matter and radiation energy density decreases below a certain limit. However this is against observation, as we know our Universe is mostly matter dominated (+ a cosmological constant) from WMAP and other related experiments. Thus there needs to be some mechanism to make these walls disappear. One possible idea is to create a small pressure difference between two sides of the wall so that the true vacuum expands to occupy the entire causal Universe. We have talked about gravity induced higher dimensional terms (> dimension 4) which break the discrete symmetry explicitly creating the required pressure difference. How these higher dimensional terms break parity is a part of some higher theory (may be hidden sector supersymmetry breaking models, or some quantum gravity models) and we do not discuss that further in our paper. The domain wall disappearance through this mechanism however puts strict constraints on the discrete symmetry breaking scale. In one class of models (having Higgs triplets and hence type II seesaw), this symmetry breaking scale has to be pretty low (< 10^5 - 10^7 GeV) . But if this theory is a part of some higher theory such as SO(10) grand unified theory, then this left-right symmetry breaking scale has to be pretty high and hence is in disagreement with the constraints coming from domain wall removal. We also discuss another class of models (with Higgs doublets and hence type III or inverse seesaw) where both these constraints can be satisfied simultaneously. The good thing about models with Higgs doublets is that domain wall removal does not put very strict constraints on the symmetry breaking scales and hence do not give rise to conflict with grand unification which usually forces the symmetry breaking scale to be very high. Comments and criticism are welcome :)

1010.6289

Even after losing enthusiasm after going through tedious peer review process, I finished the latest work (and first with my supervisor :P) and it has come on arXiv.org today with the reference number in the title of this post. It is about gauge coupling unification, fermion mass universality and type I seesaw dominance in supersymmetric left-right models with natural conservation of R-parity. The abelian B-L gauge symmetry is broken by Higgs triplet fields with B-L charge 2 and hence R-parity defined as

is conserved. The good thing about this is the natural presence of stable cold dark matter candidate in the model in terms of the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP). Anyway our focus is not on this issue. We have found that at the cost of adding a few extra superfields, the minimal version of such models give rise to gauge coupling unification (at very high scale in agreement with proton decay constraints) as well fermion mass unification. The fermion mass unification relations in SO(10) grand unified model are

What we find is that fermion mass unification is achieved properly only in the case of third (and hence the heaviest) family of fermions whereas there is some discrepancy in the case of lighter fermions. However such issues can be handled with proper threshold corrections which can be found in the literature. Good thing is that such good characteristics of gauge coupling unification and fermion mass universality can be achieved in a left-right model only which is tremendously simpler than a GUT model like SO(10). But of course SO(10) has its own charm and can't be ignored. The point is that, the desert below the GUT symmetry breaking scale at very high scale is ruled by the effective supersymmetric left right model with some additional light superfields which are part of the SO(10) gauge structure but remained light somehow till the TeV scale (for example). Our approach was bottom up in this case, however it will be good to realize this in a top-down approach. That's the goal of next project.

arXiv number 2

My second paper appeared in arXiv yesterday http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2245 . This is a study of different Left-Right symmetric models with and without supersymmetry. We tried to look at the possibility of obtaining a TeV (Trillion electron volt) scale $ SU(2)_R $ gauge symmetry breaking scale, tiny neutrino masses and gauge coupling unification simultaneously. The motivations for a TeV scale new physics just beyond the standard model of particle physics are tremendous nowadays with the LHC (Large Hadron Collider), the 14 TeV machine has started operating last year. We minimize the scalar potential for all such models and check whether the ground state allows a TeV scale $ SU(2)_R $ breaking scale and tiny neutrino masses from either type I or type II/type III seesaw mechanisms. Then we check the gauge coupling unification for the supersymmetric cases to see whether unification is achievable for a TeV scale intermediate scale between standard model and the grand unification scale. We also add parity odd singlet field to the minimal versions of the left-right models so as to break the discrete parity symmetry called D-parity between the left and right handed sectors much before the $ SU(2)_R $ breaking scale. In such models the type II/ type III seesaw terms become sensitive to the D-parity breaking scale and the type I term is sensitive to $ SU(2)_R $ breaking scale like in the usual case. We have found that only in supersymmetric left-right models with Higgs doublets we can have a TeV scale intermediate breaking scale, gauge coupling unification and small neutrino masses from either type I or type III contributions. The other cases with Higgs triplet/ bitriplet the intermediate breaking scale gets closer to the unification scale. The details can be found in the above link. Comments and criticism are welcome.

The very first paper....yet unpublished....still giving nightmares!

I am still stuck in getting my very first paper published somehow. I have addressed all the issues mentioned by the referees this time. Since there were spontaneous R-parity violation in my model, there were serious doubts regarding the stability of the dark matter candidate. In my corrected version, I have decided not to talk much about dark matter and focusing mainly on the symmetry breaking and neutrino masses in the model. One important correction which I have done is incorporating soft susy breaking terms into the model. In my earlier version I just minimized the F-term potential and found the relation between various symmetry breaking scales. Now I have added both the D-term potential as well as the soft susy breaking terms. Fortunately they did not alter the relations between various mass scales which I obtained from the F-term conditions. Since we are not talking much about dark matter, we removed it from the title also. Anyway it does not hamper the relevance of the paper since in our earlier version also, our discussions about dark matter were qualitative only. I resubmitted the paper yesterday. Hopefully there won't be any serious bug this time.

So many bibliographical complaints...:(

Just after I submitted my first paper to arXiv, I am getting complaints from people regarding citations, references etc. As a new entrants to this arxiv, SPIRES world I am naturally surprised to see people care so much about whether a new paper somehow related to their earlier work cites their papers correctly or not. I am currently making a list of all these complaints and hopefully will fix it when I replace my paper in arXiv...:)

Finally put the paper on arXiv...:)

After a long wait and a series of corrections, modifications finally I submitted my paper to arXiv.org . One of my friend Sudhanwa Patra is a co-author of this paper. The arXiv link to the paper is http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.0146 . Hopefully we will soon send it to some journal most preferably PRD. The work is all about incorporating type III seesaw of generating small neutrino masses within a Supersymmetric Left-Right model framework. We have also discussed dark matter phenomenology in a qualitative way. Suggestions, comments and criticisms regarding the paper are most welcome.